Archive for the ‘IRS and state tax collections’ Category

Tax consequences of debt discharge income

Sunday, February 14th, 2010 by Moore McLaughlin

Many financially distressed borrowers may have had some or all of their debts cancelled or forgiven by their lender last year. As tax time approaches, these individuals may not realize that they may have to report the canceled debt as income on their 2009 tax returns. McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC partners Moore McLaughlin, Esq., CPA and Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. are apprising existing and prospective clients of how discharged debts can trigger income unless one of numerous exceptions or exclusions applies.  Note that even if there is not an exception or exclusion in a given case, the taxable amount can be reduced if the amount reported from the lender can be shown to be incorrect.

In these troubled economic times, many financially distressed borrowers may have had some or all of their debt cancelled or forgiven by their lender last year. While such relief was no doubt welcome to people who received it, what they may not have realized is that debt forgiveness may have tax consequences. Specifically, debt forgiven in 2009 may have to be included as income on your 2009 return. However, not all canceled debts trigger taxable income. And, even if there is no exception or exclusion in a particular case, that may not be the last word. The tax bite may be reduced or eliminated if you can show that the amount reported by the lender is incorrect.Cancellation of debt

General rule. The tax laws specifically include income from the discharge of indebtedness in gross income. However, there are several exceptions to this rule. In addition, there are numerous exclusions from gross income for certain types of forgiven debts.

Exceptions. If the cancellation of debt by a private lender, such as a relative or friend, is intended as a gift, there is no income. Likewise, a debt cancelled by a private lender’s Last Will and Testament triggers no income to the borrower.

There is also an exception for certain student loans. For example, doctors, nurses, and teachers agreeing to serve in rural or low income areas in exchange for cancellation of their student loans will not have income from the cancellation if they meet certain conditions.

Also keep in mind that there is no income from cancellation of deductible debt. For example, if a lender cancels home mortgage interest that could have been claimed as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of Form 1040, there is no tax problem to contend with.

Price adjustment. There is no income if an individual purchases property and the seller later reduces the price. The purchaser’s basis (yardstick for measuring gain or loss on a later sale) in the property, however, is reduced by the amount of the purchase price adjustment.

Exclusions. In addition to the above exceptions, there are exclusions from the general rule for reporting canceled debt as income for:

  • discharge of debt through bankruptcy,
  • discharge of debt of an insolvent taxpayer,
  • discharge of qualified farm debt,
  • discharge of qualified real property business debt, and
  • discharge of qualified principal residence debt.

These exclusions are quite complicated and a detailed discussion of them is beyond the scope of this post. However, it is worth pointing out that the qualified principal residence debt exclusion applies where individuals restructure their acquisition debt on a principal residence, lose their principal residence in a foreclosure, or sell a principal residence in a short sale (where the sales proceeds are insufficient to pay off the mortgage and the lender cancels the balance). Also, the exclusions require certain tax attributes to be reduced and must be reported to the IRS on its Form 982.

Repurchased business debt. Income from certain repurchased business debt can be stretched out over several years. Although all of the deferred debt discharge income will eventually be recognized, you benefit from the deferral of tax to later years.

Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt. A taxpayer should receive a Form 1099-C from a federal government agency, financial institution, or credit union that forgives a debt of $600 or more. The amount of the canceled debt is shown in box 2. Any forgiven interest included in the amount of canceled debt in box 2 will also be shown in box 3. As noted above, if the interest would otherwise be deductible, it does not have to be included in income.

An individual who does not agree with the amount shown on Form 1099-C should contact the lender in writing and request it to issue a corrected Form 1099-C showing the proper amount of canceled debt. Even if the lender refuses to issue a corrected report, there still may be recourse if you have adequate documentation to show that the lender incorrectly reported the amount canceled.

If you had a debt forgiven last year, we can determine how it may affect your 2009 taxes, make sure you gain maximum advantage from any exception or exclusion that may apply, and guide you through various choices that may be available to you, depending on the specific circumstances of your situation. We also may be able to help you to resolve any discrepancy concerning the amount reported by the lender.

Contact Moore McLaughlin, Esq, CPA by e-mail at mmclaughlin@mclaughlinquinn.com or Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. by e-mail at tquinn@mclaughlinquinn.com, or either of them by phone at 401-421-5115.

The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010 by Moore McLaughlin

Don't go to jailThe IRS has issued a detailed, 80-page document discussing and rebutting many of the more common frivolous arguments made by individuals and groups that oppose compliance with federal tax laws. An accompanying news release reminds taxpayers that the penalty for frivolous tax returns is $5,000, and applies when a person submits a tax return or other specified submission, and any portion of the submission is based on a position that IRS identifies as frivolous. The tax attorneys at McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC frequently see taxpayers try to raise these arguments.  Partners Moore McLaughlin, Esq., CPA and Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. generally convince them to be realistic and deal with the IRS in a forthright manner.

The IRS’s “The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments” responds to some of the more common frivolous “legal” arguments about the federal tax system. Each contention is briefly explained, followed by a discussion of the legal authority that rejects the contention.

The document covers these broad categories of frivolous arguments: 

  • Various contentions that: the federal income tax system is voluntary; terms in the Code such as taxable income, gross income and “the taxpayer” are improperly defined; and payment of taxes is unconstitutional. Other arguments in the category have fictional legal bases, for example, that IRS is not an agency of the U.S., or that taxpayers are entitled to the refund of social security taxes paid over their lifetime. 

 

  • Frivolous arguments in collection due process cases, including various contentions that assessments are invalid, or that the statutory notice of deficiency, notice of federal tax lien or statutory notice and demand is invalid.

 

  • Contentions that the Tax Court is not authorized to decide legal issues, or that IRS personnel do not have the authority to seize property in satisfaction of unpaid taxes, or that IRS employees lack credentials.

 

A final section of the IRS’s frivolous tax arguments document explains in detail the penalties that courts may impose on those who pursue tax cases on frivolous grounds, and cites scores of cases rejecting various frivolous arguments and imposing penalties.

For a copy of this complete report, contact Moore McLaughlin, Esq., CPA by e-mail at mmclaughlin@mclaughlinquinn.com.

If you or someone you know owes taxes and needs help dealing with the IRS or state taxing authority, please contact Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. by e-mail at tquinn@mclaughlinquinn.com or Moore McLaughlin, Esq., CPA by e-mail at mmclaughlin@mclaughlinquinn.com or either of them by phone at 401-421-5115.

IRS Commissioner Doesn’t Prepare His Own taxes - Too Complicated

Sunday, January 24th, 2010 by Moore McLaughlin

Douglas ShulmanThe Commissioner of the IRS, Douglas Shulman, recently admitted that the tax code is too complex for even the commissioner of the IRS.  Click here for full story.  I have long been a proponent of the flat tax as a way to ensure a higher degree of compliance.  The tax attorneys at McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC represent taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities on a daily basis.  Many times, any errors that are found come from an honest misunderstanding of the tax code.  Often, the IRS proposes changes based on uncertain areas of the law, where no one is really sure what the right answer is.

Until Congress decides to stop its social engineering experiments, and picking winners (homeowners, ethanol) and losers (renters), Tom, Frank and I will have plenty of work.  In my opinion, the tax code should be used solely for raising revenue, not for dictating to people how to live their lives.

In the meantime, taxpayers, such as the IRS Commissioner, will have to rely on paid professionals.

Taxman may be your “Friend”

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

According to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, state revenue agents have been looking at MySpace and Facebook postings to catch tax scofflaws.  Click here for the full article.

For example, in Minnesota the tax authorities found a tax evader after he announced on his MySpace page that he was returning to his home MySpacetown to work and mentioned his new employer.  Genius!

Agents in Nebraska caught a DJ after announcing one of his gigs.  Brilliant!

California caught wind of a rigger of sails through an on-line thread to collect a 4-figure sum.  Outstanding!Facebook

Personally, I love these stories.  Can’t get enough of them.  Of course, I also watch all of the “Caught in the Act” and “World’s Dumbest Criminals” episodes I can.

Back in the real world, Tom Quinn and I help people with their IRS, Rhode Island and Massachusetts tax problems on a daily basis.  If you owe the IRS, Rhode Island or Massachusetts taxes, contact us at 401-421-5115 or by e-mail at mmclaughlin@mclaughlinquinn.com or tquinn@mclaughlinquinn.com for more information on how we can help you.

Who’s running Rhode Island?

Friday, August 28th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

Gov. Don CarcieriThe national news outlets have picked up on the story about Rhode Island Governor Donald Carcieri’s plan to shut down the state government for 12 days by furloughing certain “non-essential” state workers in an effort to cut state expenses.  Click here and here and here.  Thankfully Rhode Island is required to balance its budget every year (unlike the Federal government) otherwise who knows what would happen.  However, even with this balanced-budget requirement, our tiny little state still seems unable to properly manage its finances.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Democrats in the Rhode Island legislature increased spending this year by 12% while requiring the Governor to cut spending by around $68 million.  The Governor is utilizing these furloughs as part of his plan to cut spending.  Naturally, the state employees unions have vowed to fight this furlough, and they may win.  Click here for the full Wall Street Journal article.

Whether or not the unions prevail, tax experts are concerned about the impact on taxes in the Ocean State.  The Governor and the Legislature already raised the tax rate on long-term capital gains from 1.67% to 9.9%.  Given their reluctance to actually cut spending or to take any sort of business-friendly measures which would increase the base upon which the state income tax is calculated, the Legislature may see no other option than to increase the tax rate (directly or indirectly) on income.  They could, of course, increase other tax rates, such as the sales and use tax, or broaden the sales and use tax base (e.g. to include services).  The Legislature and the Governor already imposed a new tax on Amazon.com and other on-line retailers.  We are still waiting to see how much additional tax revenue the state will receive after several on-line retailers withdrew from Rhode Island.

The tax attorneys at McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC are keeping an eye open and an ear to the ground monitoring any rumors or discussions of changes to the Rhode Island tax laws.  As soon as we hear anything, we will post an entry to the M&Q Blog or send out an e-mail alert.  If you are interested in receiving our e-mail newsletters and alerts, please contact Michaela Costa by e-mail at mcosta@mclaughlinquinn.com and ask to be added to our list.

In the meantime, business owners, investors and everyone else in Rhode Island will just keep operating under the current rules, while wondering who’s running Rhode Island.

Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. Appointed as Bankruptcy Trustee for Rhode Island

Thursday, July 9th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

Thomas P. Quinn, Esq.Partner Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. has recently been appointed to the Panel of Chapter 7 Trustees for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island.  His appointment to this role, effective as of June 1, 2009, is based on his outstanding background in bankruptcy law that he has gained in private practice and while employed by the Internal Revenue Service.  The law firm of McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC is honored to have one of our partners appointed to such a prestigious position.

In his role as Chapter 7 Trustee, Tom will serve as a representative of the bankruptcy estate. His duties will include conducting Section 341 meetings of creditors, recovering, preserving, liquidating and distributing assets of Chapter 7 estates and protecting the integrity of the bankruptcy system.  He will also use his skills as a bankruptcy litigator to recover assets and oppose bankruptcy discharges whenever necessary.  Tom looks forward to the challenges and opportunities that his new role as a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee provides.

While serving as a Panel Trustee, Tom will continue as a partner at McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC representing businesses and individuals in financial workout and bankruptcy matters.  He will also continue to represent clients in tax collection, audit and controversy matters before the IRS, the Rhode Island Division of Taxation, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue and the United States Tax Court.

(more…)

Rhode Island Budget Bill Eliminates Favorable Treatment of Capital Gains

Thursday, July 9th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

In Rhode Island’s state budget bill for fiscal year 2010, signed by Governor Donald L. Carcieri on June 30, 2009, the lower capital gains rate is eliminated for personal income tax RI Capital Gains Tax Ratepurposes.  For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010 capital gains will be treated as ordinary income.  As a result, some capital gains in Rhode Island that could have been taxed at rates as low as 1.67% will now be taxed at rates up to 9.9%.

Click here for Providence Journal article.

At the new higher rates, 1031 exchanges and other tax-deferral techniques will see a rebound in popularity.  For more information on 1031 exchanges, visit the All States 1031 Exchange Facilitator, LLC website by clicking here.

Another Attack on RI Small Business by our Elected Officials (UPDATED, AGAIN)

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

The Rhode Island Legislature has done it again.  They have managed to find a way to not only drive more Rhode Island small businesses out of business or out of state, but at the same time they have managed to reduce tax revenues in the state.  To top it all off, their actions are likely unconstitutional.  This does not seem like the way to get Rhode Island back on its economic feet.

Amazon.comWhat I’m referring to is the recent passage of a law that requires Amazon.com to collect Rhode Island sales tax on sales made through Rhode Island-based associates.  Click here for the entire article from the Providence Business News.  Not surprisingly, Amazon.com immediately severed all relationships with Rhode Island-based associates.

Since book buyers can go directly to Amazon.com to buy their books, with no Rhode Island intermediary, Amazon does not have an obligation to collect the Rhode Island sales tax.  So, now the state will still not receive any sales tax, and no income taxes, property taxes, employment taxes, etc., from the Rhode Island-based associate that may now go out of business, or move to another state.  Absolutely brilliant! (more…)

IRS seeks more taxes on your cell phone

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

The IRS says it is looking to make it easier for taxpayers to comply with recordkeeping requirements for employer-provided cell phones. Others see this as another attack on small business.  A new notice from the IRS confirms several IRS proposals to simplify the procedures under which employers substantiate an employee’s business use of employer-provided cellphones.  The notice also requests suggestions for alternative approaches.cell-phone-tax

In 2008, two identical bills-H.R. 5450 and S. 2668, both entitled “Modernize Our Bookkeeping In the Law for Employee’s Cell Phone Act of 2008″-were introduced in the House and Senate to remove cell phones and similar telecommunications equipment from the category of listed property. These measures, which had bipartisan support, and were backed by a number of companies and business associations, were never enacted. Perhaps that is why IRS is taking the matter into its own hands.

Under Internal Revenue Code Section 132, an employee may exclude from gross income the business use of an employer-provided cell phone as a working condition fringe benefit. However, because cell phones are listed property in Code Section 280F, strict substantiation requirements must be satisfied for business cell phone usage to qualify for the code Section 132 exclusion. Moreover, any personal usage of an employer-provided cell phone is a taxable fringe benefit. Thus, the current rules require documentation of the business and personal use of the cell phone.

(more…)