Posts Tagged ‘tax’

Failure to plan

Monday, April 27th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

Most people lack adequate estate planning. The reasons for this are many and varied, ranging from lack of knowledge to procrastination, and everywhere in between. I have had the misfortune to witness the downside of not having proper estate planning. For example, did you know that in Rhode Island, if you die without a will, your surviving spouse may not get all of your assets?

Education is the key to motivating our clients to complete a proper and thorough estate plan. Once they understand that a good estate plan can have very little to do with death taxes, but everything to do with planning for your final years and taking care of your family when you die. The federal estate tax affects a very small percent of Rhode Islanders, but a very large percent of Rhode Islanders have children.

We also have clients who “just don’t get around to it.” We had one client who was supposed to meet with us to complete his estate plan. We pushed and prodded for several years. The week he returned from the hospital in Vermont, he came to see us. It seems he broke his neck skiing. Fortunately, he was fine, but he was now a motivated client. Another client set up an appointment following a hair-raising plane flight with his wife.

One particular CPA sat on his documents, unsigned, for almost three years until he and his wife could decide who to appoint as the guardian for their two minor children in the event the he and his wife dies at the same time. Luckily nothing happened to either of them during this period of inaction.

planaheadAt a minimum, everyone should have a durable power of attorney and a health care proxy. These documents provide legal authority for someone to act on your behalf while you are alive, but unable to make financial and medical decisions for yourself. My experience has been that these documents as at least as important as your will.

Our goal is to help people realize the importance of the various aspects of estate planning to the end that they seek out competent legal advice.

Social Engineering through Taxes

Monday, April 27th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

As a tax attorney and CPA, I have studied the federal Internal Revenue Code extensively over the course of the last 20 years. Some people may tell me to get a life and that I could not have possibly chosen a more boring or inane field of study. socialengineering1

For my entire life, I have always loved puzzles. My mom tells my two young sons how good I was at solving puzzles as a kid. I think of the Internal Revenue Code as a puzzle, a big complex and multi-faceted puzzle. My understanding of this puzzle started to develop in great detail during my studies at New York University while obtaining my Masters of Law in Taxation. In particular, famed tax expert Prof. Martin Ginsberg taught my class on tax policy. For the first time, I started to see how the Internal Revenue Code is used not merely for the purpose of raising revenue for the federal government, but for social engineering.

If the sole purpose of the Internal Revenue Code was to raise money for the government to spend, then a flat tax, with no or few deductions, would seem to be appropriate. Perhaps that was the idea when the U.S. constitution was amended to allow the income tax. Now, however, things have changed. And, I don’t see them going back.

Here are some examples of social engineering through the tax laws. Some lawmaker determined that Americans should own their own homes and that the tax law should punish those that don’t. To impose this idea, homeowners can take tax deductions for interest and real estate taxes on their homes while renters, who pay these same costs indirectly, cannot. Another example is the credit for day care expenses for children. Where is the credit for stay-at-home moms? There are only about a million more examples.

These days the tax laws are so complicated that even the Treasury Secretary and other high-level administration officials cannot even understand and comply with the rules. How can the average person or business owner be expected to? Removing the social engineering provisions and other Congress-blessed goodies would be a good first step in the right direction.